Groton, MA Fires 8/31

August 31st, 2010 1 comment

Groton continues to burn! Have to wonder if they have an ATV riding fire bug or something…


(Collected from internet, thanks Beaker.)

By Robert Mills, rmills@lowellsun.com
Updated: 08/30/2010 08:11:41 PM EDT

GROTON — Firefighters from 18 communities converged on Groton and Dunstable Monday evening to battle a brush fire that burned an estimated 10 to 15 acres between Chicopee Row and Martins Pond Road.

Dunstable Fire Chief Charlie Rich, coordinating efforts to battle the blaze from a command point set up on Chicopee Road, said firefighters learned of the blaze at about 3:30 p.m., but initially had a hard time locating it.

Rich said the fire was about a half-mile from the nearest street.

Firefighters accessed it from Chicopee Row and from Floyd Hill Road, a dead-end off Martins Pond Road.

As darkness fell, crews were working to create a perimeter around the fire. Rich said firefighters would be back to continue fighting it first thing in the morning.

A mobile command center and special operations vehicle from the Massachusetts Department of Fire Services joined crews at the scene.

Categories: Incidents, Massachusetts, New England Tags:

A budding drought in New England

August 19th, 2010 No comments

Potential to setup a fall fire season in New England. Connecticut has been receiving just enough rain to stay as moderate fire danger, but it’s flirting with build-up being sufficient to become “high.”

August 10th Drought Map

August 17th Drought Map

July, 2010 Fires

July 11th, 2010 No comments

We have a bona fide summer fire season this year.

It’s been setup by a dry spell that has had the last significant rainfall in large parts of Southern New England be on June 23rd. Around the 4th of July was spectacular warm but dry weather; then following for Monday it turned extremely hot and humid with temps breaking 100º Monday and Tuesday.

Yesterday, July 10th, some areas received heavy rain. My home, however, barely broke the 1/4″ mark:

Major fires struck in Groton, MA (two separate incidents) and Holden, MA. The Holden fire covered approximately 50 acres and was attended to from Monday (5 July) through Friday. The first Groton fire of around 12 acres was active from Monday through Wednesday, then a fire in a separate section of town was fought on Thursday and Friday. After checking the perimeter and determining the active fire on Saturday was burning with no danger of exposing improved property, and with rain imminent within a few hours, it was allowed to burn without firefighting efforts.

Fires this time of year tend not to spread fast (the Connecticut fire danger hasn’t popped above “Moderate” during this spell yet), but go deep following the roots. Run hoses out into the woods, and leave them in place for a few days even for small one or two acre fires so you can return and wet down the area each day. Grub around with tools like Pulaskis and shovels.

Southwestern Connecticut was hit hardest in this state, with some of the fires reported on the ctfire-ems.com forums being:

4 July: Middletown (South District). Initially under control 1537. 1730 it was running again and a large m/a request made. Durham Tanker, Haddam Tanker and Brush Unit’s, Westfield, Portland, Middletown, DEP to scene. Middlefield, Middletown with cover assignments to South District.

5 July: Bethany, m/a Hamden, Woodbridge, Oxford, Prospect, Beacon Falls, Seymour for coverage. Fire located 1-1/2 miles off the road; ATVs could bring FFs about half-way in then rest on foot. Hose laid to fire.

7 July: Mulch pile fire on state property, Farmington. East Farms (2 Engines), Farmington (2 Engines), Oakland Gardens (Engine), Tunxis Hose (Engine), Plainville (Coverage), State DOT for front end loader.

7 July: New Milford, under 1 acre burning along power lines. Waterwitch, Gaylordsville, Northville, Brookfield (last three for tanker & manpower), New Milford Ambulance, Roxbury Rehab Unit

11 July: Voluntown, mulch pile. Voluntown, Griswold (2 ETs), Jewett City (Engine, Ladder), plus tankers from Preston City, Lisbon, Baltic, Moosup

The first Groton fire was accessible only to ATVs, and my sources report a 20′ x 18″ trench was hand dug around the perimeter. The second fire would see the hiring and deployment of three bulldozers on Friday. Bulldozers are very, very rarely used in New England. Both Connecticut and Massachusetts own one, but the single time I know of in the last ten years that each has been used they were used primarily to build an access road to a fire deep in the woods; in Groton the dozers were used to make fire line.

Pictures from the Groton Fires sent to me:
From the 8-9 July Fire:

From the July 5-7th incident…Brookline for a UTV! (With the fire also burning in Holden taking resources from Central Mass, a task force from Metro Boston was pulled in, along with resources from District 14 (Framingham region) and Merrimack Valley)

WBZ has a real nice video on the Holden fire here. (In my archives as Holden_July_2010.mpg in case that link disappears). Holden’s press release tallied up 29 communities that had come to it’s assistance.

Mashpee, MA also had a significant fire covering 5 acres. Cape News Net has a great article here (archived copy), from which these photos were taken. Some great, great examples of Brush breakers in action:

Indians in Early New England

June 3rd, 2010 No comments

This is a great read describing the situation of indian clearings and cultivations at the time of European contact:

Indian New England Before the Mayflower

The author, Howard Russell, also wrote the authoritative history of agriculture in New England, a book I own and have thoroughly enjoyed reading over the years.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Quebec Smoke affects New England

May 31st, 2010 No comments

A minor redux of the Dark Day of 1780:

An article in the Cape Cod Times:

By Karen Jeffrey
Cape Cod Times
May 31, 2010

That smoke getting in your eyes, your hair and your homes today is coming from Canada, according to the National Weather Service.

Police and fire departments across the Cape are reporting numerous calls from people reporting the smell of smoke, and in some cases, seeing smoke drift across their property this morning.

However, the fires producing the smoke are not local, they are riding air currents down from our neighbor to the north – Canada.

Northwest winds are bringing smoke into Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont from wildfires that are burning in Canada, according to the National Weather Service.

People with respiratory problems were being advised to limit their outdoor activities.

According Canadian press reports there are more than 50 forest fires burning in the in Quebec, including eight that are out of control.

About 1,200 firefighters, including some from Maine, New Brunswick, New Hampshire and western Canada are working to put them out. Canadian newspapers report that Ontario’s Ministry of Natural Resources reports 73 active forest fires today, mostly north of Toronto. The province rates the forest fire danger “extreme” and has declared a restricted zone in the northeastern part of the province to reduce the danger of human-caused fire.

The weather service says the northwest winds are expected shift to the southwest on this afternoon and end the smoky conditions.

According Canadian press reports there are more than 50 forest fires burning in the in Quebec, including eight that are out of control.

And this was from the National Weather Service:

THE VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES IN COORDINATION WITH THE
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE HAS ISSUED AN AIR QUALITY ACTION DAY FOR
ALL OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN VERMONT. AN AIR QUALITY ACTION DAY
MEANS THAT PARTICULATE CONCENTRATIONS WITHIN THE REGION MAY
APPROACH OR EXCEED UNHEALTHY STANDARDS.

DENSE SMOKE FROM LARGE WILDLAND FOREST FIRES ACROSS CENTRAL QUEBEC
HAS DRIFTED ATOP THE REGION TODAY WITH VISIBILITIES LOCALLY AS
LOW AS 1 MILE BEING REPORTED.

It drifted in Brooklyn around 5:30 or so. Kind of funky seeing smoke everywhere you looked!

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Meridian Fire, Michigan

May 19th, 2010 No comments

Interesting fire burning just northeast of Roscommon, MI (yes, as in the Roscommon Equipment Center that does a lot of forest fire R&D!)

It’s burning in a white pine, red pine, and jack pine area of Huron National Forest and adjacent areas. Wildland Fire Today has some good posts here, here, here, here, and here.

That may not be quite typical of southern New England in how large of areas are pine dominated, although it looks a lot more like southern Maine. But it’s burning in moderate winds and low humidity (14%) that is very common in New England, as well as flat terrain. These are conditions much more like New England then you see in fires out west.

Note the spotting that looks perhaps a mile ahead of the main fire line.

This is a good presentation on spotting, archived here.

“Close In” spotting is stuff that might go a few feet — say cross a 4′ to 6′ control line. If it’s only an occasional spot easily policed by a firefighter with a handtool or indian can, not a problem. If it’s prolific, you need a change in strategy and tactics.

Prolific is one of the big warning signs. Think the ember storms you see in some videos engulfing houses, since they can light an overwhelming number of fires.

Short range: Beyond “close in”; say tens of feet up to 600′

Medium range: 600′ to a mile.

Long range: > 1 mile

This picture shows spotting across a good 40′ of gravel and pavement…clearly this fire was going to require big burnouts from control lines well in advance of the fire to attack it at this time of day. I believe that’s Jack Pine. Jack Pine can be “scrubby” in poor soil, but it can also grow tall and straight. It is closely related too (and can hybridize with) Lodgepole Pine.

It sounds like most progress was made after night fall when they could make good progress on building fire lines as the fire left the crown and came to ground. Makes you think of the need for fairly long range planning, trying to use air resources and initial attack to protect structures and control spot fires during the day while pre-positioning resources like dozers and burn out crews to launch an all out assault once the conditions turn more favorable in the cooler, moister, and usually calmer evening.

The northeast wind on Tuesday, 5/18 that drove it turned to a northwest wind on Wednesday, 5/19. I’d imagine the focus of efforts was to make sure that southern / eastern flank was well secured, as well as being concerned if there were any unknown spot fires that could be driven by the new winds.

The forest types of Huron National Forest:

As a followup, I was the area and found the 1980 Mack Lake Fire which is documented here. It started 8 miles almost due east of this fire.

Lots of good stuff in that report. The Mack Lake fire ranks in the top for forest fire spread and BTU release rate recorded in North America. It averaged 2mph, hit 7mph peak. 27,000 BTUs/foot/second were estimated, with a theoretical maximum (for all forests) being 30,000.

It was a prescribed burn that got out of control, resulting in a LODD (Dozer Operator), 44 structures, and 20,000 acres lost in the first six hours, then it was essentially out except for mop-up.

Perhaps most interesting: This area of Michigan, per tree ring research, experiences a 10,000 acre fire an average of every 28 years.

They seem to follow a basic pattern — the weather isn’t remarkably bad (moderately warm day, moderately low humidity, moderate winds) but once they get going they run like a bat out of hell until it’s either early evening or they run out of jack pine and into hardwoods. Then the fire goes to ground and is easily contained overnight.

The last major fire before this one was Mack Lake, so it this was pretty much right on schedule.

Why no fire shelters in Canada

May 14th, 2010 No comments

Nice report on why British Columbia, the only province that used shelters, discontinued them when the new style shelters were issued. Archived here.

There’s only two LODD incidents I know of in southern New England due to the fire (and not exertion / medical problems). One is this 1938 burn over on Cape Cod which killed three firefighters. The other was in Rhode Island near the Connecticut line, possibly in 1942 although I still have to hunt down official documentation, which again killed three in a burn over of their truck. I don’t know if shelters would make a difference in the circumstances of these burn overs. It may be better to emphasize the Canadian / Australian model of better awareness and avoidance for the conditions in this area.

Fighting Fires in India

May 10th, 2010 No comments

Saw this pop up on Google News. Don’t think I even have a category for something this far afield :)

Reminded me of the early Connecticut forest fire guides written at a time that tools and equipment were so primitive and in short supply that it directed using things like green cedar boughs to beat out fires, and that wet sacks worked well too.

Now, they clear all growth on either side of the roads and boundary lines of forests and burn the debris so that accidental fire could be prevented from spreading inside the forests. How far they are effective is anybody’s guess ! At vantage points like hill tops, tree-top machans, fire watchers on daily wages are engaged and stationed during the fire season to watch for any fire occurrence through indications of rising smoke, and to immediately communicate to the ground staff through wireless network.

Forest fires are extinguished manually by beating the fire with green leaf brooms unlike in developed countries where helicopters are used to sprinkle or shower water over burning areas, which is very expensive. Fire tenders cannot reach the spot due to steep terrain and absence of roads.

Rest here, with an archived one here.

Categories: Outside of New England, Tactics Tags:

A visit to Rhode Island, and more

May 10th, 2010 No comments

Photo essay from the Wood River Valley area: http://d90.us/wooden_nutmeg/essays/Arcadia_2010/

A really great write up of managing fire in New England Pine Barrens, archive here.

In addition to those “natural community” issues, few active firefighters have seen truly severe fire conditions in New England.

Although rainfall alone doesn’t dictate fire danger (frequency of rain is likely much more important in New England in keeping fire danger to “high” or below), the following graphs show a very sharp difference between pre-1970 and post-1970 climate. You can get more data for different regions of the New England states here.



I strongly suspect that it is not coincidence that we haven’t had a serious forest fire problem in southern New England since the early 1960s. Before, roughly, 1970 we used to experience a deep drought about every ten years. Nothing since 1970 has matched those 10 year droughts.

Also I’m still researching the frequency rain events. Rain tends to “reset” the fire danger.

Let’s assume a cycle like this; while conjecture it’s not an unreasonable cycle based on my observations over the years:
Day 1: Rain (Low danger)
Day 2: Moderate
Day 3: High
Day 4: High
Day 5: High
Day 6: High
Day 7: Very High
Day 8: Very High
Day 9: Very High
Day 10: Rain (Low)

Now add in one overnight rain:
Day 1: Rain (Low danger)
Day 2: Moderate
Day 3: High
Day 4: High
Day 5: Rain overnight (moderate)
Day 6: Moderate
Day 7: High
Day 8: High
Day 9: High
Day 10: Rain (Low)

Most people wouldn’t notice a major impact from an extra shower or two in April, but it could be having a very large impact on fire danger.

Pitchy Trees

May 7th, 2010 No comments

Going far outside of New England, I stumbled on this interesting article:

At old ranches and on some remaining farms near the foothills, one can see old barbed-wire-fence “pitch posts.” These relics of a bygone era artistically reveal some Colorado history and provide an interesting forestry lesson.

Pitch posts were cut and split from the dense and heavy wood of live pitchy trees. Pitch is a resin found in evergreen trees and it forms when trees are injured. When the injury is caused by heat from ground-surface, low-intensity forest fires, and the fire has not killed the tree, more sap is made. This resin then concentrates in outer layers of sap-wood.

Long ago, forest fires were started from lightning and often times by indigenous people. Native Americans knew that a flush of new and tender vegetation that sprouts after fire meant well-nourished game and thus better hunting. With no human effort to suppress forest fires, they were frequent, and trees were often injured by fire.

In those conditions, a “relatively young,” 150-year-old tree may have received fire damage three, four, five or more times in its lifetime. A living tree exposed to that many fires accumulates high concentrations of pitch all the way from its heartwood center out to the bark.

Back then, many forest fires persisted for months. These long-lasting fires took on a variety of day-to-day behavior, depending upon weather, terrain and fuel conditions in their path. Some fires smoldered underground for a long time as root fires, only to be rekindled with a strong, dry wind. Over centuries of time, subsequent fires affected miles and miles of forest, covering a wide range of aspects and elevations.


Archived here.

Connecticut and Rhode Island, May 1930

May 5th, 2010 No comments

May, 1930 Fire Outbreak in the Northeast

The articles that follow are from the New London Day documenting a break out of wildfires in Connecticut and Rhode Island (as well as the rest of the northeast).

There were warning signs at the very end of April, with a large fire in Colchester, East Hampton, and Marlborough consuming 3,000 acres. Even by the standards of the day that was a fairly large fire:

A few days later Waterford had a woods fire.

This one only covered 100 acres, but something ominous was occurring:

Foreman Thomas B. Woodworth of the Quaker Hill fire department [said] some of the “new” fires broke out 1,000′ ahead of the firemen. He said that it was possible the blazes may have been started from blazing bits of dried chestnut wood.

Ok, so we’re also in the middle of the Chestnut Blight that put a very large load of dead fuels in the forests. But that aside, since the trees were dead the year before and the year after and we didn’t have these intense fires every year…they were seeing “spotting” 1,000′ ahead of the fire. In Connecticut. (This is the first documentation I’ve seen that gives a distance with what we can expect for spotting in our area in an extreme fire year).

Then all hell broke loose.

From The New London Day on May 5, 1930:

Six homes, thirty other buildings, and 3,000 acres in Westerly and Charlestown, RI that burned essentially to the sea:

250 homes in Nashua, NH are destroyed by a brush fire that turned into an urban conflagaration:

A fire in Glastonbury, later put at around 2,500 acres, would burn five miles in length from it’s origin, and at one point reach four miles wide. Being fought by 1,000 men. “Small” fires burning 60 to 150 acres destroyed buildings in Newtown & Windsor. Another 1,000 acres in Bristol. And a 2,500 more acres in New Britain / Southington / Plainville. So a 1,000 men…that’s what, a request for 40 strike teams today? And oh by the way, we have two more fires of this size within 20 miles of here, too…oh I’d love to be a fly on the wall when that request arrives at the DEMHS.

Meanwhile in Massachusetts, 1,500 acres was burning by Marlborough and 2,000 acres in Russel, two of the “20 bad and 75 minor” fires that day:

Niantic was busy trying to protect their cottages from a brush fire:

I only got the last half of this article on New London County…multiple fires in Waterford with hundreds fighting them, Gungywamp in Groton, 2,500 acres in Preston, Ledyard, and North Stonington:

On the sixth comes an article that would have folks throw a fit today:

Finally, at the risk of pulling a Ron Popeil and going, “But wait, there’s more!”

Connecticut’s first state forester, Austin Hawes, would later place the total acreage in Connecticut that burned in this first week of May, 1930 at around 25,000 acres. And they were actually kind of pleased by that — the last bad year of 1922 had seen 80,000 acres burn.

Washington County, RI would see some 30,000 acres burn. An article up above already mentioned the 3,000 acre fire in Westerly. North of Westerly there were two more fires that burned along the Connecticut and Rhode Island borders, in Rhode Island alone one consumed 10,000 acres and the other 12,000.

The worse of these ignited around Glasgo, CT (Griswold by the Voluntown town line) and burned all the way to Nooseneck Hill Road — today’s R.I. Route 3, or spitting distance from where I-95 crosses the state today. The proximity of the two big fires, along with the spotting that was occurring, it’s quite likely they were a single fire and/or merged along the way.

May 1930 Rhode Island

May 4th, 2010 No comments

This same fire is described several times in various histories of the Yawgood Scout Reservation, such as this one:

The plateau was the place where Chief Williams and “Gus” Anthony had a dangerous encounter with the great forest fire, as described in the second edition of The Story of the Yawgoog Trails:

Chief Williams and Gus Anthony stood on this plateau on Sunday afternoon, May 3, 1930 amidst the blinding smoke and falling embers and heard the roar of the great forest fire that came sweeping down from the Beach Pond area six miles [10 kilometers] away. “The fire roared like an express train as the giant white pines exploded into flames like torches.” Chief and Gus ran for their lives back down the trail toward Rathom Lodge (Williams and Tracy).

(There may some exaggeration going on — Beach Pond is 3 miles due north of Yawgoog, maybe 4 to the far northwest corner of the pond. Or the origin was considerably behind Beach Pond, either north or west of it and Beach Pond was used simply as a convenient land mark)

From the August, 14 2005 Providence Journal:

Byline: John Kostrzewa

Aug. 14–HOPKINTON — AFTER 75 YEARS, THE GREAT FIRE’S LESSONS LIVE ON: The Great Fire of 1930 burned a terrible chapter into the history of Camp Yawgoog.

It was a tragedy and a natural disaster.

The fire destroyed all but 50 acres of the Boy Scout camp set deep in the woods of South County. The devastation drove the birds and ground animals from the blackened and desolate landscape.

The sounds of life disappeared.

While the story of the Great Fire is a dark memory from Scouting’s past, it also is a story about hope, turning disaster into triumph and rallying for a common cause.

Mostly, it’s about Scout spirit that today still burns brightly at Yawgoog.

Here’s what happened 75 years ago this summer.

The winter and spring of 1930 were among the driest on record. The lack of snowfall and rain reduced streams to trickles. The water level in Yawgoog Pond dropped several feet.

Back then, Scouting in Rhode Island was still in its infancy. Most people had never heard of Yawgoog.

But two early Scout leaders, J. Harold “Chief” Williams and H. Cushman “Gus” Anthony, envisioned the wooded area as a future summer camp for boys and began to develop the property the new organization acquired.

They cleared some land for tents and erected a mess hall and headquarters.

During the first weekend in May 1930, Williams and Anthony were leading a training session for Scout leaders at Yawgoog when the fire warden came into camp. He warned that a fire had broken out well to the west, in Connecticut, and was spreading. He told them to be on the lookout.

Williams and Anthony smelled the smoke the next morning, as soon as they poked their heads out of their tents. They sent a team of campers and local volunteers with buckets, brooms and rakes to set up firebreaks at the edge of camp.

They walked west through the campground until they saw three huge columns of smoke on the horizon.

The fire, whipped by strong winds, approached with a terrifying roar. The thick smoke overtook them. The heat seared the buttons on their shirts.

They were forced to retreat and decided the only parts of camp they might save were the main buildings.

Anthony climbed to the roof of the lodge at the camp called Three Point and sprayed the roof and walls with water from a garden hose. Other adult leaders pushed their cars into the pond to escape the embers.

The fire swept along Yawgoog Pond and through the campground. Flames surrounded them, but Williams, Anthony and the others saved the lodge.

The next morning, the fire broke out on the far side of Yawgoog Pond, across from the camp. The fire crept along the shore and then leaped to Phillips Island. The Scout leaders watched the giant pines and white birches on the island ignite like torches.

Still, it was not over. The blaze continued the third day along Wincheck Pond at the opposite end of the camp.

When the fire finally died out, Williams and Anthony hiked through what was left of Yawgoog. Tent platforms, several cabins, even the docks had been destroyed. Charred tree trunks and rubble, still-smoldering, were visible for acres.

It was Anthony who first noticed the silence that had settled over the camp. The wildlife had fled, seeking sanctuary from the fire.

Standing in the black ashes, a foot deep in places, Williams and Anthony looked out at what was left of their vision.

“It was heartbreaking,” Williams said.

But he also saw the opportunity. He saw the chance to pull together a fledgling organization of troops scattered throughout the state to work on a common goal.

The fire had been front-page news in the daily papers. With Rhode Islanders focused on the damage, Williams put out the call and began to build a network of Scouting supporters in business, industry, government and the media. They all agreed to pitch in.

“We began at once to think of reforestation,” Williams said.

Two weeks after the fire, on an early Sunday morning, 500 Scouts and leaders from 79 troops from across Rhode Island arrived at the gates to Yawgoog. Each troop was assigned a section of camp and given an initial batch of 50 seedlings purchased from a nursery in Maine.

In a single, long day, the Scouts and volunteers planted 25,000, five-year-old white pine seedlings over 250 acres.

When the Scouts finished, a light rain blessed their work.

“Mother Nature has begun to heal the blackened wounds,” Williams said.

Fourteen months later, in July 1931, judges, politicians, business executives, editors, benefactors, Scouts and adult volunteers gathered at Camp Yawgoog.

They were there to dedicate the Bucklin Memorial, the huge, stone and wood-beamed building that serves as camp headquarters. But the talk was about the trees. The softwood pines planted by the Scouts grew among the hardwoods that had sprung back to life.

Federal forestry agents said it was the single largest reforestation effort in the history of Rhode Island — a model for others to follow.

And walking through camp, they all heard the sounds of life again.

Since the Great Fire, Yawgoog has become a familiar name to Rhode Islanders and one of the premier camps in the country.

Scouting has grown, too. But there also have been more tragedies, especially this summer.

During the national jamboree last month in Virginia that attracted 40,000 Scouts, four leaders were electrocuted setting up camp. Later, 300 Scouts there suffered heat exhaustion. In a separate incident elsewhere, a Scout from Utah was struck by lightning.

And then, Yawgoog itself was closed for 12 days after a contagious stomach virus sickened more than 100 Scouts.

Last Sunday, after a fresh scrubbing, Yawgoog reopened. About 800 Scouts spent a great week earning merit badges, making friends, learning to live as a community and having fun.

On the same trail hiked by William and Anthony to inspect the devastation from the Great Fire, the Scouts may have seen the marker for the reforestation, or heard the story told around the campfire.

It’s a pretty good lesson for Scouts and for that matter, for all of us.

John Kostrzewa, business editor, spent last week as a volunteer at Camp Yawgoog.

To see more of the The Providence Journal, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.projo.com.

Copyright (c) 2005, The Providence Journal, R.I.

Categories: Connecticut, History, Incidents, Rhode Island Tags:

Rain isn’t always good…

May 3rd, 2010 No comments

This passed through this afternoon. Fortunately low fire danger. If this had set up when active fires were burning it would have been a potentially critical situation, at least in the areas that didn’t get the down pours associated with the t-storms. At my house we just got barely enough to wet dry surfaces with a few minutes of high winds:

From a strategic point of view, crews in light fuels, like hardwood leaf litter, would probably be OK as long as they know it’s coming and consider the impact on slop over of control lines, and are ready to get into good black. Crews in brush or under potential crown fires should be advised to seek safer areas till it passes.

URGENT - WEATHER MESSAGE
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE TAUNTON MA
401 PM EDT MON MAY 3 2010

CTZ003-004-MAZ005-006-012>014-RIZ001-032115-
/O.CON.KBOX.WI.Y.0022.000000T0000Z-100503T2100Z/
TOLLAND CT-WINDHAM CT-CENTRAL MIDDLESEX MA-WESTERN ESSEX MA-
SOUTHERN WORCESTER MA-WESTERN NORFOLK MA-SOUTHEAST MIDDLESEX MA-
NORTHWEST PROVIDENCE RI-
INCLUDING THE CITIES OF...UNION...VERNON...PUTNAM...WILLIMANTIC...
FRAMINGHAM...LOWELL...LAWRENCE...MILFORD...WORCESTER...FOXBORO...
NORWOOD...CAMBRIDGE...FOSTER...SMITHFIELD
401 PM EDT MON MAY 3 2010

...WIND ADVISORY REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 5 PM EDT THIS
AFTERNOON...

A WIND ADVISORY REMAINS IN EFFECT UNTIL 5 PM EDT THIS AFTERNOON.

A NARROW LINE OF SHOWERS...IS GOING TO PRODUCE A BURST OF WESTERLY
WINDS GUSTING TO NEAR 50 MPH. THIS WILL CAUSE A FEW TREE LIMBS AND
BRANCHES TO BREAK...RESULTING IN SCATTERED POWER OUTAGES AND ROAD
CLOSURES ACROSS EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS...NORTHERN RHODE ISLAND AND THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF CONNECTICUT.

ALREADY THERE HAVE BEEN REPORTS OF TREES DOWN WITH GUSTS FROM 45 TO
55 MPH ACROSS WESTERN AND CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS AND NORTH CENTRAL
CONNECTICUT BETWEEN 240 PM AND 340 PM.

THIS LINE OF SHOWERS PASSES THRU QUICKLY AND WINDS WILL QUICKLY
SUBSIDE WITHIN AN HOUR OF ITS PASSAGE.

Massachusetts Wildland Urban Interface Training

May 3rd, 2010 No comments

Held 27 March 2010 at a former Air Force radar station in the Cape Cod National Seashore..


(Dave Celino is the big kuhana — Chief Fire Warden, Bureau of Forest Fire Control call sign C-1)
I have it archived here.

Categories: Policy, Strategy, Tactics Tags:

April 30, 2010 Hampton, CT

May 1st, 2010 No comments

My company went mutual aid for a structure fire “through the roof” reported by a UPS driver on a long dead end road near the Brooklyn / Hampton town line. House was on the ground on arrival, so the woods fire was more interesting. You can find a full write up here.

West winds at 10mph, gusts to 20mph. Much better then the NW@20, Gusts to 40mph of the day before!

The fire grew to 3 to 5 acres in size (I didn’t GPS the perimeter), mainly because of initial concentration on the structure before engines and firefighters were put onto the woods fire. It was burning in primarily hardwood leaf litter, with a few small groves of hemlocks. Some young hemlocks did torch, and when the wind gusted even the leaf litter could produce 2′ flames.

What I like in the photo above is it shows a small spot fire. In these conditions if you wanted to successful with an indirect attack you probably needed a 3′ wide fire line to stop wind driven leaves from “rolling” across it. Leaf blowers backed up by hand tools would’ve done a heck of a job.

Categories: Connecticut, Incidents, Tactics, Tools Tags:

Esocheag, RI Fire Tower

May 1st, 2010 No comments

Slowly rotting away. The metal looks in good shape, not sure I’d trust the wood anymore!

Rhode Island stopped routinely staffing their fire towers around 1990, although some are occasionally staffed by the DEM on the worse fire danger days. Esocheag seems to get no love. This tower was erected in 1938, is 80′ high, and sits at 560′ above sea level. Photos from 2004 and 1990 can be found here. (In those pictures you’ll see a “candy cane” radio tower, that is no longer there. There is a newer tower which is un-painted and I believe shorter. It may have been erected a little further south then the radio tower in the older pictures, too.)

This tower would’ve looked down at a 30,000 acre fire a few miles to it’s north in 1942, and nine years later it would witness an 8,000 acre fire burning just to it’s south.

I do have mixed feelings on fire towers. From a romantic standpoint, I think they’re cool. From an economic standpoint, you would have to have some sharp pencils to show me that they are cost effective. There are some volunteer staffing programs around the nation (see this post), and it makes me wonder if you compromised with the State maintaining the towers and retired (but in good health) volunteers manning them the few critical weeks each year if it would be a reasonable compromise.

When Connecticut discontinued their fire towers in the 1980s they removed them, so at least we don’t have pathetic sights like watching Esocheag rot away. Massachusetts still staffs a number of their towers, with more in a “reserve” status that sees them manned occasionally. When listening to a fire in Dudley last week when the Charlton tower was closed due to lack of staff, the Patrolman from Douglas State Forest went up the Oxford tower to get a third, more accurate line since the towers in Princeton and Mendon were having difficulty pinpointing it and determining if it was a single and not multiple fires.

May, 1951 Wood River Fire

May 1st, 2010 No comments

Burned 8,000 acres in Exeter and West Greenwich Rhode Island. I drove this area today, man…so many good photos to take of woods ready to explode once again I have to plan a day for the photos I want to take! May need to wait till next spring before “green up” for maximum effect.

Another large fire was burning in the Massachusetts / Connecticut / Rhode Island border region as well.

Last few days of April, 1942

May 1st, 2010 No comments

Those who read this blog know a central event I like researching is the complex of fires lit on April 30, 1942 by Edward LaCasse which burned some 50 square miles in Eastern, Connecticut (Sterling primarily), and Rhode Island (primarily Coventry and West Greenwich).

I just found this nifty piece from the 28 April 1942 New London Day — in addition to numerous smaller brush fires in the region that were proving difficult to extinguish due to re-kindles (see this post), there were at least two very large forest fires burning in Eastern Connecticut in the days before LaCasse’s arson spree. One in Groton consumed 1,000 acres, while another in Voluntown, ignited by accident when gasoline spilled on a hot engine, consumed 2,000 acres as well as a house and several outbuildings:

Categories: Connecticut, History, Incidents Tags:

Bringing Back The Burn

May 1st, 2010 No comments

One of the best articles I’ve read on the use of prescribed fire on Cape Cod’s Pitch Pine & Scrub Oak Barrens: Bringing Back the Burn from the July 2005 issue of Northern Sky News. Archived here.

Tennessee Forest Fire Hand Tool Tactics

April 28th, 2010 No comments

Archived here.

Categories: Tactics, Tools Tags:

Central Massachusetts Forestries

April 26th, 2010 No comments

“Forestry” is probably the most commonly used term in this area for a wildland fire apparatus, especially on the radio. Brush truck is commonly used in ordinary speech. Some are called “Engine” or “Tanker” as well, and especially the tankers we’ll get back to later on. “Breakers” are their own beasts designed specifically for making their own path through the pitch pine and scrub oak barrens around Cape Cod — Brit Crosby has an excellent special section here covering them.

I started thinking about this post when reading recently this firehouse.com thread. That thread talked about anything from whether tires should be chosen to float over mud or cut through it to firm soil, to whether F-550s are really appropriate for brush trucks and, to paraphrase, “people are forgetting what brush trucks are for going that large!” Even the disadvantage of diesel engines — a lot heavier up front increasing the risk of sinking your front end when encountering soft terrain.

Two things I want to go over in this post:

1) Compare the specifications on the classic Dodge Power Wagon WM-300 to some modern day chassis;

2) To the comments about an F-550 being too large, to show even larger trucks that are used in very appropriate ways off-highway in Central Massachusetts…while they also use nice, compact forestries very effectively too.

The classic Dodge Power Wagon, a civilian descendant of the military WC series of trucks first fielded in 1941, is perhaps the most well regarded chassis for a basic forestry truck in my area. In today’s national ICS parlance, a “Type 6 Wildland Engine.”

Massachusetts Bureau of Forest Fire Control Power Wagon (7-5)

Massachusetts’ Bureau of Forest Fire Control still has nearly a dozen, like the above, in their active inventory.

Some basic specs on the 1961 Power Wagon WM-300, a one-ton version (the full specs are here):
GVWR: 8,700#
Payload Capacity: 3,000#
Curb Weight: 5,700#
Front Axle Capacity: 3,750#
Rear Axle Capacity: 6,500#
(Optionally the GVWR could be increased to 9,500#)

Compare this to a 2011 F-250 with a gas engine:
GVWR: 10,000#
Payload Capacity: 2,940#
Curb: 7,060#
Front Axle: 6,000#
Rear Axle: 6,200#

Of course in all these debates about what is best for off-road and how modern 1 ton diesels just have too much weight up front, yadda yadda yadda…notice the old power wagons came from a popular option of a factory installed winch. People have always been getting stuck.

But I think it’s good to remember a well accepted classic for its off-road capability is more like a modern 3/4 ton then today’s one ton and heavier trucks.

But weight isn’t the only factor — each area has its own unique circumstances.

Central Massachusetts “Heavy Forestries”

(Photos below courtesy of massfiretrucks.com)

I call these trucks “Heavies” — most don’t even fit neatly into the Engine Typing scheme, being significantly larger then the minimum for a Wildland Type 3, but not seating enough to be considered a Structural Type 1 or 2 (but otherwise meeting the requirements). A number do double-duty as small tankers as well.

Charlton Tanker 2, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

Usually these work together with much more modest smaller trucks:
Charlton Forestry 1, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

While the thought of a forestry carrying a 1000 gallons or more probably would cause fits for those who think F-550s are too big, Alan Brackett has a nice photo essay on some recent fires in our area which includes this nice photo that shows the two above trucks operating at an incident together at http://www.pbase.com/abrackett/image/123871294. In the right area this is a very effective combination. You can even add a third component of ATVs / UTVs that handle the worse and muddiest terrain for relaying manpower, equipment, and even small amounts of water.

Dudley has a combination that uses a heavy engine along with two J series Jeep forestries:

Dudley Engine 4, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

Dudley Forestry 1, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

Dudley Forestry 2, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

Some other similar heavies:

Leicester Forestry 3, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

Oxford Forestry 2, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

Upton Forest Fire Department Engine 3, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

The Upton Engine above is interesting if you read the lettering on the door — it reads, “Forest Fire Department.” Many communities in Massachusetts formerly operated two separate fire departments, one which handled forest fires and a second that handled structure fires. This came out of the system of Town Forest Fire Wardens. Most have now consolidated fully, but I believe there are handful that remain separate organizations, and some number more that are essentially one department but with two separate budget allocations from the town.

Massachusetts, at least over the last 25 years, has a history of using a lot of military surplus trucks as “tankers” — this isn’t something I’ve personally seen that much of in Connecticut or Rhode Island; maybe in the past but certainly not in recent decades. But they remain common in Massachusetts. While some serve rural communities, many serve towns where most of the population lives and tanker operations are only needed in small sections of their communities.
Douglas Tanker 1, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

Milford Brush 1, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

Milford Tanker 1, image courtesy www.massfiretrucks.com

There are lot more examples if you poke around on www.massfiretrucks.com

Categories: Apparatus, Tools Tags:

National Fire Danger Rating System

April 25th, 2010 No comments

You can find a summary of the background of NFRDS here.

This is the simple what it means summary:

Numeric Class / Adjective Class
1 / LOW
Fires will not spread beyond heat of campfire or brush fire.
2 / MODERATE
Fires will start from open flame, camp or brush fire. Spreads slowly.
3 / HIGH
Fires will start from a lighted match and spread rapidly in dry grass, slower with moisture. Will continue to spread until extinguished.
4 / VERY HIGH
Fires will start readily from match or glowing embers and spreads rapidly as it increases in size. May crown young conifers.
5 / EXTREME
Fires start readily from sparks or cigarette butts. Spread and crown rapidly. Spot fires common. All burn fiercely and may blow up unless controlled promptly.

More on Massachusetts Bureau of Forest Fire Control Staffing

April 25th, 2010 No comments

Following up on this earlier post.

Bottom line:
15 full-time Patrolmen where given layoff notices.
6 were saved for the year by funding the Federal Stimulus funds.
7 “bumped” themselves into other DCR positions (laying off junior employees in those positions).
2 were laid off.

They have a seasonal force of 54.

This is down from the early 1980s when they had, in addition to 16 Patrolmen, 53 fulltime firefighters who worked both on apparatus and towers as needed, plus 104 seasonal firefighters.

Interesting reply from this T&G Article:

Its 13 fire districts for 13 Wardens and one Chief.In those 13 fire districts they had a total of 16 fire patrolman positions to cover the whole state of Massachusetts.

Only 6 Patrolman positions was saved, 4 in the Southeast down the cape region,1-North Middlesex and 1-Hampshire County on federal grant programs for a year or two .

So actually they lost 10 fire patrolman positions not funded anymore and never could fill the 53-fulltime fire truck & tower positions that was never filled thru the many years when they became vacant from retirement,they just kept on cutting positions of about 53 fulltime fire positions gone already since the 80′s..

They also had back then 104 fire seasonal employees to man all 52 towers to fill in on days off & assisting the engine operators fighting fires ,each district had at least one fulltime tower man so in case the fire tower was needed in the late fall or winter dry season the tower position would be manned.Remember the seasonal tower positions are only staff from April to October,.That leaves out the months of November, December, January, February, March if there is no snow cover and have a dry period of no snow,warm temps,low humidity you could still have fire breaking out and it has happen before past fire history.

Posted by ret.Firefighter | report abuse

And the main article:

By Brian Lee TELEGRAM & GAZETTE STAFF
9 comments | Add a comment

Picture

Enlarge photo

Recent significant brush fires after record rainfalls have surprised some people, a state official said.

But all the ingredients, including the aftereffects of the December 2008 ice storm, are in place for such fires, said David Celino, the state’s chief forest fire warden in the state Department of Conservation and Recreation.

“It does take the public by surprise, especially when we have open burning through May 1,” Mr. Celino said. “People, coming off the rains with historical flooding, look at the idea of having a fire threat as not there, when in fact it’s easy to get escape fires with this kind of a weather pattern.”

Among the incidents was last week’s 350-acre brushfire on Tekoa Mountain in the western Massachusetts town of Russell. State officials put together a 20-person crew out of the DCR to contain it within two days, Mr. Celino said.

In Central Massachusetts, there was an estimated 55-acre brush fire in Dudley Tuesday. It was in a heavily wooded area between Hayden Pond and Corbin and Baker Pond roads near the Charlton and Oxford lines.

It took about six hours and firefighters from six surrounding towns and the DCR to extinguish the fire, according to Dudley Fire Capt. David J. Konieczny, whose department walked the area Wednesday to make sure it was completely out.

Earlier this month there was a six-acre brush fire on the south scenic face of Mount Pisgah Conservation Area Trail in Northboro.

According to Mr. Celino, in many cases the ice storm increased the volume of tree limbs and branches on the ground, particularly in central and northern Worcester County, into Hampshire and Franklin counties and central and northern Berkshire County at elevations higher than 1,000 feet.

A year later the fuels on the ground have cured in the affected areas, creating the problem, he said.

After a year of curing, and with the recent rains, the area has seen fine fuels such as leaf litter, sticks and twigs become main carriers for some fires, he said.

The rainfalls were followed by dry air from the Arctic region. The low humidity and dew points can essentially dry out in less than a day the light surface fuels, Mr. Celino said.

Add to it southerly warm and dry winds and it makes for high fire danger, he said.

Capt. Konieczny of Dudley said he was impressed that the fire was first seen from a DCR fire observation tower in Princeton, quite a distance from a tower in Charlton that was not staffed at the time.

Mr. Celino said there was good visibility that day.

“The Dudley fire was a great example of how we were able to make the best of what we have,” he said. “The towers were able to locate that fire and then we were able to put state resources on the fire to help get containment.”

However, staffing levels in the towers concern Northboro Fire Chief David M. Durgin, who said he believed it played a factor in the Mount Pisgah fire. He said fire towers in Princeton and Sudbury were not staffed at the time, so they couldn’t see it.

“That’s why the fire ended up being as large as it was, six acres, and no early notification,” he said.

In October, Chief Durgin wrote his local legislators stating his concern about potential DCR staffing levels as a result of budget cuts.

“It’s a case where the state is saving money, but the cities and towns, even if someone had been put in those two towers on overtime that day, it would have been cheaper than the ultimate costs of the number of towns I had to bring in mutual aid to extinguish that fire,” he said.

Mr. Celino said the tower program is his agency’s top priority.

“We know that it’s valuable to the fire service, getting early detection, and so even though we did go through part of a staff reduction plan, we realized that the tower program is a priority,” he said.

Its seasonal roster reflected that concern, as seasonal workers were brought in earlier than usual this year, he said.

There are more than 40 fire towers statewide. Most are staffed by seasonal workers, Mr. Celino said. The agency is employing 54 seasonal workers throughout the state through the first week of October.

During high fire danger days the state can staff about 22 towers, depending on what the shifts are, he said.

“If we can get anywhere from 17 to 22 of those towers up, and those are our key towers, they provide us pretty good coverage across the state,” Mr. Celino said.

The DCR has 13 district fire wardens and six patrolmen who work with towns during fire season, as well as with the seasonal workers, he said.

Last October, 15 patrolmen received layoff notices but only two were laid off. Six jobs were saved with federal stimulus money, and seven went elsewhere in the agency through bargaining rights, Mr. Celino said.

State Sen. Stephen M. Brewer, D-Barre, said his office has been in touch with the state office of Energy and Environmental Affairs and the DCR. They were told that the federal stimulus money that was allotted at the beginning of this season will last for two seasons to keep the towers manned.

“The challenge for the forest fire issue is what happens when the federal stimulus money goes away?” the senator said, adding he hoped that things would get better as the economy improves.

Because some forest fires along the Route 2 corridor are caused by train sparks, he said he would be “more than happy to go after the railroads” for liability.

“If Joe Six-Pack threw a cigarette they’d be going after him, that’s for sure,” Mr. Brewer said.

Patricia A. Correia, fire warden in northern Worcester County, was at a three-acre brush fire Wednesday at Bearsden Conservation Area in Athol. She said its cause was most likely the railroad that runs through the conservation area.

A few tidbits on the old Connecticut Fire Crews

April 20th, 2010 No comments

Connecticut started it’s Interstate Fire Crew in 1978, and this started become a regularly deployed unit after the 1988 fire season(1). That was the year of the great Yellowstone fires, and at least from my perspective as an east coast primarily structural firefighter seemed to mark the bend in a river, after which the spigot of funding opened up ever increasing resources to wildfire efforts out west.

It was around this time you started to see an increasing western influence in Connecticut as well as the rest of New England. Yellow shirts were far from universal even with state employees at this point, but they became more and more common.

If we turn the clock to 1990, the Interstate Fire Crew was well established but it, as it still does, depends on volunteers from outside the DEP to fill it out. Most major State Parks and State Forests maintained their own fire apparatus, and when the DEP was called to a fire the local Unit Manager and maintenance personnel would respond. I don’t know about the fulltimers, but the seasonal maintainers I worked with would simply receive on-the-job training from the fulltime tradesmen. (I worked a couple seasons during college in uniform as a “Park Aid” — i.e. security — for the DEP, my senior year I moved on and spent the summer doing conservation work for my town’s newly purchased conservation land).

The state still was operating it’s High School & UConn fire crews. These were phased out right around 1990, although I don’t know the exact year.

Yes, I said High School. In my region the closest was the Quaddick Crew out of Tourtellotte High School in Thompson, CT. These students who had received some basic training could be dismissed from classes and would meet up, if my memory is right, with the Unit Manager for Quaddick State Park and other DEP employees who would drive their apparatus. The UConn program was similarly run.

Here is a recollection from the Avon, CT Fire Department history about a youth crew from the high school their students attended in 1945:

I was a member back in 1945, at the age of 15 years old. I was on the State of Connecticut Forest Fire Crew that was made up of high school kids from the Canton High School. This crew went out on a minutes notice when the call came in on a forest fire. The state would call the high school and the principal would announce that the fire crew was excused to go out on the fire call. Our transportation was an old Packard four door with all our gear stored in a big wooden box on the rear bumper. Mrs. Fran Emigh was the driver and her husband was the State Forest Warden.

The good thing is these were organized crews, with some basic training and pre-existing leadership. It wasn’t unusual at the time for high school students to be “pressed” into service as this 1947 article from New York shows:

Even after the substantial modernization of the statutes governing Connecticut’s forest fire control laws in 2001 (Public Act 01-150), state fire control personnel retain the ability to summon the assistance of all able bodied residents between the age of 18 and 50 to duty to control forest fires.

Here’s an article discussing a fall fire that had the UConn crew respond:
New London Day Article 29 October 1952

These crews wound down around 1990, I’d assume from a combination of budget cuts (Governor Weicker was fighting to impose an income tax, so there was a lot of hanky panky with budgets going on(2)), increasing exposure to the “qualification system” used by the Interstate Fire Crews, and tightening up on the youth labor laws and general adoption of higher occupational safety standards. The continuing decrease in major fires from maturing forests, fewer sources of ignition (fewer cigarette smokers, better spark arrestors, less burning of yard debris and brush), more people traveling more frequently to detect fires sooner, 911, improved firefighter organization; tools; and notification systems, also likely contributed.

Since then, while fire qualified DEP employees seem to still be dispersed around the organization, the “Units” that respond to fires have also gone down. Natchaug State Forest and Pachaug State Forest remain the two units with apparatus, plus I believe the DEP Squaw Rock maintenance depot. Pachaug, in particular, is a major fire cache. The state parks at Quaddick, Mashamoquet, and Hopeville as far as I can tell no longer respond as units, although they may have individual employees respond. Fort Shantok State Park which also did fire duty no longer exists, having been turned back over to the Mohegan tribe.

Footnotes:
1) NYT article from September 15, 2002.

2) The state park I worked at in 1990 closed our more visible campground on a state highway. However we didn’t have any reduction in head count — fulltime or seasonal. It was simply the DEP political bosses ordering facilities closed to make it seem that we couldn’t afford to keep it open. As it was a rustic campground, the only marginal cost we saved was toilet paper and a weekly can full of lime for the pit toilets. The $6 or so we charged per night back then should have covered that expense.

Roads

April 19th, 2010 No comments

From this 2009 application for federal economic stimulus funds:

Connecticut‟s State Parks and Forest road infrastructure is amass in deferred maintenance. A 2006 State forest road inventory estimated 305,403 tons of gravel and 37,255 tons of stone were needed to correct existing non-point source pollution concerns. In addition, a March 2008 CT DEP Engineering Unit sufficiency study rated 61% of State parks and forest bridges in either a fair or poor category. The number of forest access roads closed for public safety and environmental concerns continues to rise creating increased logistical difficulties for wildfire suppression and emergency ambulatory response. The Connecticut State Park & Forest Road Rehabilitation Project will significantly reduce non-point source pollution risk and improve watershed ecosystem function by bringing substandard road-stream crossings up to current Army
Corp of Engineer performance standards. Rehabilitated roads will allow for increased forest management thus improved forest health and protection. Timber constructed bridges will utilize renewable construction material contributing to additional indirect forest products industry jobs.

Categories: Facilities, Roads Tags: